Emerging

Airborne gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin measured across office buildings with differing symptom rates

A survey of office buildings reported substantially higher airborne endotoxin concentrations in buildings where occupants reported more symptoms.

How to read this

This library reports what studies found. An entry describes a study's design, its findings in its own terms, and its limits. Nothing here is a claim about what a Sage Co. home does, delivers, or prevents.

Last reviewed August 30, 2026.

What they studied

  • A survey of 1,355 employees across 19 governmental office buildings in the Netherlands.
  • Air sampling for gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin.
  • Comparison of buildings classified by occupant symptom prevalence.

What they found

  • Airborne endotoxin concentrations were reported as several times higher in the higher-symptom buildings.
  • Gram-negative bacteria were recovered more frequently in those buildings.
  • The authors reported that measured physical building characteristics did not explain the symptom difference.

What this study does not establish

  • Cross-sectional design; exposure and symptoms measured concurrently.
  • Office buildings, not residences.
  • The study does not establish that endotoxin caused the reported symptoms.
  • This entry reports the study. It is not a statement about any building Sage Co. designs or constructs.

Source

Teeuw KB, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Verhoef J (1994). Airborne gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin in sick building syndrome: a study in Dutch governmental office buildings. Archives of Internal Medicine 154(20):2339–2345.

endotoxinbacteriaofficessick building syndrome