Published critique of the WHO-commissioned radiofrequency and cancer systematic review, with the authors' reply
Frank JW, Moskowitz JM, Melnick RL, et al.; reply by Karipidis K, et al. (2025) · Environment International
Members of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields argued that the 2024 systematic review had methodological flaws that undermined its conclusions, and the review authors replied that their protocol, risk-of-bias assessment, and moderate-certainty rating stood, with both letters published in the same journal.
What they studied
Correspondence; no study population
What they found
Members of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields argued that the 2024 systematic review had methodological flaws that undermined its conclusions, and the review authors replied that their protocol, risk-of-bias assessment, and moderate-certainty rating stood, with both letters published in the same journal.
What it does not establish
This entry reports the study. It is not a statement about any building Sage Co. designs or constructs.
Source
- Frank JW, Moskowitz JM, Melnick RL, et al.; reply by Karipidis K, et al. (2025). Published critique of the WHO-commissioned radiofrequency and cancer systematic review, with the authors' reply · Environment International · Read at the source
Last reviewed September 23, 2026.
Related reading
- Residential magnetic field exposure measured against childhood leukemia in a pooled analysis of nine studies
- Residential magnetic fields and wire codes measured against childhood leukemia in a pooled analysis of 15 studies
- Birth address distance from high voltage power lines measured against childhood cancer in England and Wales
- Mobile telephone use measured against glioma and meningioma risk in the 13-country INTERPHONE case-control study
- Review of provocation studies of idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields
- Residential magnetic fields measured against childhood leukemia in a pooled analysis of four recent studies