Airborne gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin measured across office buildings with differing symptom rates
Teeuw KB, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Verhoef J (1994) · Archives of Internal Medicine 154(20):2339–2345
A survey of office buildings reported substantially higher airborne endotoxin concentrations in buildings where occupants reported more symptoms.
What they studied
A survey of 1,355 employees across 19 governmental office buildings in the Netherlands.
Air sampling for gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin.
Comparison of buildings classified by occupant symptom prevalence.
What they found
Airborne endotoxin concentrations were reported as several times higher in the higher-symptom buildings.
Gram-negative bacteria were recovered more frequently in those buildings.
The authors reported that measured physical building characteristics did not explain the symptom difference.
What it does not establish
Cross-sectional design; exposure and symptoms measured concurrently.
Office buildings, not residences.
The study does not establish that endotoxin caused the reported symptoms.
This entry reports the study. It is not a statement about any building Sage Co. designs or constructs.
Source
- Teeuw KB, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Verhoef J (1994). Airborne gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin in sick building syndrome: a study in Dutch governmental office buildings · Archives of Internal Medicine 154(20):2339–2345 · Read at the source
Last reviewed August 30, 2026.
Related reading
- Understanding Ventilation in Hot-Humid Climates
- LBNL Indoor Environment Group — IAQ Science
- NIST Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation Group
- ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.2 — Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Residential Buildings
- ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 241 — Control of Infectious Aerosols
- EPA Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications
